Sir, last August,17th was published in your newspaper – ENGLISH, WE PRESUME- an article, signed by Mati Bolaños, whereby author highlighted the risk of doping substances in sportsmen health. Even though being in according to her conclusions I would like to use this space to accurate some ideas exposed in the post.
First of all, no all doping substances are drugs or bad for health and no all drugs are doping substances. For instance, alcohol is a drug but sportsmen do not acquire any advantage and, on the other hand, a blood self transfusion is a doping activity that is not a risk for health.
Secondly, some doping substances are a risk to health depending on doses, so EPO (erythropoietin), is bad in high doses –risk of heart attack- and good for physiologic recovery in low doses.
Moreover, not every substance that helps to improve a sport results is a doping substance, for instance, water, glucose, salt, orange juice and the like. These products are called ergogenic aids, in other words, substances that improve the fitness without being hazardous for human body.
Finally, I want to comment about two invisible doping system, one accepted and the other one will be debated in the next few years, I mean, technological doping and genetic doping. We must realize that the improvement in sport results are not reached only with personal sacrifice but with owning the very modern pole vault, a bath suit made in NASA or another expensive materials far from the most of sportsmen economies. Regarding on genetic doping, who is going to deny body modifications in human body with genetic therapies so normal nowadays in other areas?
I would not finish without spend a line against IOC (International Olympic Committee) that has passed a new method of doping: Politic Doping, it consists of selecting a country like China –a Human Right offender-to organize the Olympic Games because of political and economical influences, no matter of trampling on the Olympic spirit.
In conclusion, we should appreciate those sportsmen who struggle to improve, no merely for a victory but to show us the best values of a human being plain and simple, and send the cheaters off sport for life.
First of all, no all doping substances are drugs or bad for health and no all drugs are doping substances. For instance, alcohol is a drug but sportsmen do not acquire any advantage and, on the other hand, a blood self transfusion is a doping activity that is not a risk for health.
Secondly, some doping substances are a risk to health depending on doses, so EPO (erythropoietin), is bad in high doses –risk of heart attack- and good for physiologic recovery in low doses.
Moreover, not every substance that helps to improve a sport results is a doping substance, for instance, water, glucose, salt, orange juice and the like. These products are called ergogenic aids, in other words, substances that improve the fitness without being hazardous for human body.
Finally, I want to comment about two invisible doping system, one accepted and the other one will be debated in the next few years, I mean, technological doping and genetic doping. We must realize that the improvement in sport results are not reached only with personal sacrifice but with owning the very modern pole vault, a bath suit made in NASA or another expensive materials far from the most of sportsmen economies. Regarding on genetic doping, who is going to deny body modifications in human body with genetic therapies so normal nowadays in other areas?
I would not finish without spend a line against IOC (International Olympic Committee) that has passed a new method of doping: Politic Doping, it consists of selecting a country like China –a Human Right offender-to organize the Olympic Games because of political and economical influences, no matter of trampling on the Olympic spirit.
In conclusion, we should appreciate those sportsmen who struggle to improve, no merely for a victory but to show us the best values of a human being plain and simple, and send the cheaters off sport for life.
Web powered by Fotovacaciones.com
3 comments:
great work ^^ !!!!
i dind´t find any mistake (:... I only don´t agree with "sacrifice but with owning the very modern pole..." I always get trouble with due to and owing to?? you can use due to here??? i am only asking I DON´T KNOW ):
again I am sure... YOU WILL PASS (:
I think this article is your best this summer. The information about doping it's very interesting. You have improved a lot. See you in the exam. Bye!. I've done some comments
Sir, (I think is Sir-) last August,17th (I'd write; on the last 17th August) (it) was published in your newspaper "ENGLISH, WE PRESUME" an (the) article, "(tittle)" signed by Mati Bolaños, whereby (the) author highlighted the risk of doping substances in sportsmen (machista!! sportspersons or sportspeople) health. Even though, being in according (I'd write: I was in according) to her conclusions ...
...and, on the other hand, a blood self transfusion (self-transfusion) is a doping activity that is not a risk for health.
Secondly, some doping substances are a risk to health depending on doses, so EPO (erythropoietin) is bad in high doses –risk of heart attack- and good for physiologic recovery in low doses (I think is in big and small doses)
Moreover, not every substance that helps to improve a sport result(s) is a doping substance, for instance, (:) water, glucose, salt, orange juice and the like. These products are called ergogenic aids (I suppose acids, no sida), in other words, ...
...few years, I mean ( don't write "I mean", only for spealing), technological doping and genetic doping. We must realize that the improvement, in sport results, are not reached only with personal sacrifice but with (I'll quite this "with") owning the very modern pole vault, a bath suit made in (the) NASA or another expensive materials far from the most of sportsmen economies. Regarding on genetic doping, who is going to deny body (I'll change body for some) modifications in human body....
I would not finish (I am not going to finish )without spend a line against IOC (International Olympic Committee) ...
great composition
Post a Comment