Historically the controversial about Art have been one of the most questionable questions, philosophically and aesthetic speaking. The meaning, the definition or the use of Art have been the most commune answer to the eternal question “what is art?”
We are far away of the Expressionism, Classicism, and Barrow. But as I see it, it does not means that everything showed in a museum is Art.
We are far away of the Expressionism, Classicism, and Barrow. But as I see it, it does not means that everything showed in a museum is Art.
.
Last week I was in León, I visited the Musac, a new age building used to display photography, sculpture and pictures. Although it seems very modern, except some photography I really don’t enjoy with anything. For instance, there was a carpet with some books, the books have been choosing by the author because they were very important for him in his life.
I was so angry when I was it… I mean, I think the author was joking with me, with us, Art is that? If it is so, I find that every of us can be an artist, so came on, put all your books on a carpet and be famous.
Last week I was in León, I visited the Musac, a new age building used to display photography, sculpture and pictures. Although it seems very modern, except some photography I really don’t enjoy with anything. For instance, there was a carpet with some books, the books have been choosing by the author because they were very important for him in his life.
I was so angry when I was it… I mean, I think the author was joking with me, with us, Art is that? If it is so, I find that every of us can be an artist, so came on, put all your books on a carpet and be famous.
.
It is stupid, isn’t it?
I really don’t understand why it was there, art for me is something different. I don’t have a clear idea and probably I am not able to explain my own art view. Although it doesn´t mean that I can’t discern what it can’t be art for me.
A grate philosopher called Gadamer speaks about the art dead. He insisted on the fact that, only when the art dead, Art is recognised like Art. So Art needs to dead to be consider like Art. History would be our better guide to appreciated Art because with an historical and temporal view we would be able to appreciate it. It could means that, we are not appreciating the new age art and maybe once we died, the new generations will be able to appreciated it. I highly don’t trust on it. A carpet with books can’t be art.
It is stupid, isn’t it?
I really don’t understand why it was there, art for me is something different. I don’t have a clear idea and probably I am not able to explain my own art view. Although it doesn´t mean that I can’t discern what it can’t be art for me.
A grate philosopher called Gadamer speaks about the art dead. He insisted on the fact that, only when the art dead, Art is recognised like Art. So Art needs to dead to be consider like Art. History would be our better guide to appreciated Art because with an historical and temporal view we would be able to appreciate it. It could means that, we are not appreciating the new age art and maybe once we died, the new generations will be able to appreciated it. I highly don’t trust on it. A carpet with books can’t be art.
.
But like everything, any of us have their own view, so maybe if you had watched it, you would have enjoyed. Art can be only the way of see something. A way of see cultural and historically defined. Despite of the heterogeneous taste of everyone I find quite difficult to understand this kind of art. Almost impossible.
But like everything, any of us have their own view, so maybe if you had watched it, you would have enjoyed. Art can be only the way of see something. A way of see cultural and historically defined. Despite of the heterogeneous taste of everyone I find quite difficult to understand this kind of art. Almost impossible.
.
Last February in Arco, a little draw made by children in a kinder garden was buy for hundreds of Euros. So, it can be Art to?
Maybe all of us are artist and I really don’t see it before. So create and take out the sleepy artist you have inside.
Last February in Arco, a little draw made by children in a kinder garden was buy for hundreds of Euros. So, it can be Art to?
Maybe all of us are artist and I really don’t see it before. So create and take out the sleepy artist you have inside.
Web powered by Fotovacaciones.com
3 comments:
Historically, (the controversial about Art have been one of the most questionable questions*) ((Did you use the redunday on porpuse? If not, better show how many synonims you actually know: I’ve just found out about the word: ‘QUERY’ which means the same)) philosophically and aestheticLY speaking. The meaning, the definition or the use of Art haS* been the most ((commune)) answer to the eternal question “what is art?” ((COMMUNE: where hippies live. You mean COMMON))
We are far away of the Expressionism, Classicism, and ((Barrow)). But as I see it, it does not mean-* that everything showed in a museum is Art. ((BARROW: like a wheelbarrow? Did you mean: BAROQUE?))
.
Last week I was in León, I visited the Musac, a new age building used to display (good word) photography, sculpture and pictures. Although it seems very modern, except some photographIES(,) I really didn’t* enjoy with anything. For instance, there was a carpet with some books, the books (were chosen)* by the author because they were very important for him ((in his life)) <- i do not think this is the best option, but i cannot tell you a better one)).
I was so angry when I saw it*… I mean, I think the author was ((joking with me))<- are you sure joke with someone is correct? I thought it was at someone, but i’m not sure at all! Please, if you are sure, tell me so that I can say correctly)), with us, Art is that? If it is so, I find that every(ONE)* of us can be an artist, so cOme on*, put all your books on a carpet and be famous.
.
It is stupid, isn’t it?
I really don’t understand why it was there, art for me is something different. I don’t have a clear idea and probably I am not able to explain my own art view, although it doesn´t mean that I can’t discern (good word) what it can’t be art for me.
A grEAT philosopher called Gadamer speakED* about the ‘art dead’. He insisted on the fact that, only when the art dies*(??) ((when gadamer says: art dies, does he mean art tendencies?)), Art is recognised like Art. So Art needs to ((dead))* to be considerED* like Art. History would be our better guide to appreciated Art because with an historical and temporal view we would be able to appreciate it. It could mean-* that, we are not appreciating the new age art and maybe once we died*, the new generations will be able to appreciated it. I highly don’t trust – it*. A carpet with books can’t be art.
.
But like everything, ((everyone* of us have their own view**)), so maybe if you had watched it, you would have enjoyed. Art can be only the way ((of see*)) something. A way ((of see)) cultural and historically defined. Despite of the heterogeneous taste of everyone I find quite difficult to understand this kind of art. Almost impossible.
.
Last February in Arco, a little draw made by children in a kinder garden ((was Bought*)) for hundreds of Euros. So, it can be Art tOo*?
Maybe all of us are artist and ((I HAVE NOT SEEN it*)) before. So create and take out the sleepy artist you have inside.
*The controversial (singular) - have been (plural – questionable questions (plural)
*The art has been
*It does not mean-
* past simple
* were chosen
* saw it – I guess
*everyone
* called (past simple) – speaks (present simple)
* die or to be dead – to be considered
* it could mean-
* once you died (sound weird): when we die (it is very simple, but, unless, it is correct)
* trust + dierct object
* everyone
* everyone (sing) of us have (plural) their (plural, third person plural) own (POINT OF) view
* OF + verb-ING
* was boght
* too
* I have not seen it before
- I MARKED ALL THOSE MISTAKES SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THAT ALMOST ALL YOUR MISTAKES ARE VERY SIMPLE TO AVOID. READING THE WHOLE TEXT AGAIN HELPS US TO FIND ALL THOSE MISTAKES THAT MAKES US FAIL AN EXAM. WE ARE SUPPOSED TO CONTROL ALL THOSE VERBS AND COLOCATIONS. AND WE ACTUALLY DO, BUT I THINK, THE PROBLEM IS LACK OF ATTENTION ON THE TEXT. SO, JUST REVIEW YOUR COMPOSITION FOCUSING ON EVERYWORD AND YOU WILL PASS YOUR EXAM WITH A HIGH MARK!
- I totally agree with your text. Most of people are divorced with Art because of that kind of displays.
Historically, (the controversial about Art have been one of the most questionable questions*) ((Did you use the redunday on porpuse? If not, better show how many synonims you actually know: I’ve just found out about the word: ‘QUERY’ which means the same)) philosophically and aestheticLY speaking. The meaning, the definition or the use of Art haS* been the most ((commune)) answer to the eternal question “what is art?” ((COMMUNE: where hippies live. You mean COMMON))
We are far away of the Expressionism, Classicism, and ((Barrow)). But as I see it, it does not mean-* that everything showed in a museum is Art. ((BARROW: like a wheelbarrow? Did you mean: BAROQUE?))
.
Last week I was in León, I visited the Musac, a new age building used to display (good word) photography, sculpture and pictures. Although it seems very modern, except some photographIES(,) I really didn’t* enjoy with anything. For instance, there was a carpet with some books, the books (were chosen)* by the author because they were very important for him ((in his life)) <- i do not think this is the best option, but i cannot tell you a better one)).
I was so angry when I saw it*… I mean, I think the author was ((joking with me))<- are you sure joke with someone is correct? I thought it was at someone, but i’m not sure at all! Please, if you are sure, tell me so that I can say correctly)), with us, Art is that? If it is so, I find that every(ONE)* of us can be an artist, so cOme on*, put all your books on a carpet and be famous.
.
It is stupid, isn’t it?
I really don’t understand why it was there, art for me is something different. I don’t have a clear idea and probably I am not able to explain my own art view, although it doesn´t mean that I can’t discern (good word) what it can’t be art for me.
A grEAT philosopher called Gadamer speakED* about the ‘art dead’. He insisted on the fact that, only when the art dies*(??) ((when gadamer says: art dies, does he mean art tendencies?)), Art is recognised like Art. So Art needs to ((dead))* to be considerED* like Art. History would be our better guide to appreciated Art because with an historical and temporal view we would be able to appreciate it. It could mean-* that, we are not appreciating the new age art and maybe once we died*, the new generations will be able to appreciated it. I highly don’t trust – it*. A carpet with books can’t be art.
.
But like everything, ((everyone* of us have their own view**)), so maybe if you had watched it, you would have enjoyed. Art can be only the way ((of see*)) something. A way ((of see)) cultural and historically defined. Despite of the heterogeneous taste of everyone I find quite difficult to understand this kind of art. Almost impossible.
.
Last February in Arco, a little draw made by children in a kinder garden ((was Bought*)) for hundreds of Euros. So, it can be Art tOo*?
Maybe all of us are artist and ((I HAVE NOT SEEN it*)) before. So create and take out the sleepy artist you have inside.
*The controversial (singular) - have been (plural – questionable questions (plural)
*The art has been
*It does not mean-
* past simple
* were chosen
* saw it – I guess
*everyone
* called (past simple) – speaks (present simple)
* die or to be dead – to be considered
* it could mean-
* once you died (sound weird): when we die (it is very simple, but, unless, it is correct)
* trust + dierct object
* everyone
* everyone (sing) of us have (plural) their (plural, third person plural) own (POINT OF) view
* OF + verb-ING
* was boght
* too
* I have not seen it before
- I MARKED ALL THOSE MISTAKES SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THAT ALMOST ALL YOUR MISTAKES ARE VERY SIMPLE TO AVOID. READING THE WHOLE TEXT AGAIN HELPS US TO FIND ALL THOSE MISTAKES THAT MAKES US FAIL AN EXAM. WE ARE SUPPOSED TO CONTROL ALL THOSE VERBS AND COLOCATIONS. AND WE ACTUALLY DO, BUT I THINK, THE PROBLEM IS LACK OF ATTENTION ON THE TEXT. SO, JUST REVIEW YOUR COMPOSITION FOCUSING ON EVERYWORD AND YOU WILL PASS YOUR EXAM WITH A HIGH MARK!
- I totally agree with your text. Most of people are divorced with Art because of that kind of displays.
I think Mati did all the work. Without watching the Mati's opinion, I noticed that you have some problems with verbs:past perfect, ing after preposition, ...be careful! Also I have noticed that you don't put the sign ! after some phrases in imperative.
In some occasions, you write art with "A" or "a" .
On the other hand it is a difficult topic to write about, I don't understand much, when I am at a Museum, pictures like me or not, it is very simple.
Come on! You only need a bit!
commune (collective, cooperative,..) I think the word would be "common".
..showed in a museum was Art or was called Art?. I don't understand what you mean these last two phrases.
..sculpture and picture...
...have been chosen or selected...
..I mean... only spoken English.
...can be or could be an artist...
..came on or come on..... be famous!
Although it doesn´t mean that I can’t discern what it can’t be art for me.... a bit confusing.
A grate philosopher (an irritant?)
A way of see (seeing) cultural and historically defined..I don't understand.
Maybe all of us are artist and I really don’t see it before (haven't seen before)
So create and take out the sleepy artist you have inside!
Post a Comment